|
||||||||
Pages
**************** **************** |
CHANCERY FILES A warning to anyone wishing to view any of these files. You need patience and dexterity. The files are composed of large sheets of paper, rolled together in bundles. Separating the sheets you want can be a problem. So can reassembling the bundles. Reading from the sheets can also be a problem. Partly physical: sheets sometimes get crumpled, so it is difficult to follow a line of text across the width of a sheet. But the big trial is following the narrative. It is written in the most appalling legalistic jargon, with heaps of repetition and few, if any, punctuation marks. After viewing a number of files, you will probably get into the habit of skipping certain areas. Occasional passages are worth copying verbatim, but it is usually better to make notes on relevant points.
Norbury suits C12/1698/55 1787 Penrice v Fisher C12/1713/30 1790 Penrice v Fisher C12/453/19 1794 Norbury v Hill C12/208/9 1794 Norbury v Meredith C12/218/5 1796 Norbury v Attorney General To appreciate the story of the three wills of Coningsby Norbury, you need to read the whole sequence. If you're just studying Cort, you can make do with two. Norbury v Attorney General is quoted elsewhere as one of the three major sources on Cort. It arose because Coningsby's brother Richard, who had to administer the estate, suspected Cort owed it money. But Cort's assets were forfeited to the Crown, so the Attorney General had to tell Richard he was second in the queue. The file includes an affidavit from Cort explaining his involvement in Coningsby's financial affairs. The value of Penrice v Fisher (1787) is that it contains one of the few passages shedding light on Cort's character: generous, at least where his friends were concerned.
Attwick suits C12/707/20 1751 Attwick v Attwick C11/2517/3 1753 Attwick v Peachy C12/540/17 1770 Becher v Dawson C12/552/9 1770 Becher v Kentish
C12/2220/7 1724 Macartney v Attwick C11/666/7 1739 Macartney v Attwick C12/1487/7 1764 Getheridge v Attwick C12/1664/50 1781 Neal v Attwick C12/2122/3 1781 Attwick v Wickham C12/2122/3 1781 Attwick v Adams These suits deal with disputes outside the family, and are largely of academic interest. The last three involve William Attwick, disproving a fanciful notion that his niece, whom Cort married, inherited the Attwick business in 1775. Navy agent suits Five groups of actions involving Cort illustrate the legal wrangles in which navy agents became involved.
C12/1922/32 1758 Duez v Hankey C12/1570/13 1759 Duez v Hartley C12/1923/33 1765 Duez v Kidd C12/1922/33 1772 Duez v Cort This sequence covers the attempts made by Ann Duez to recover money she thought was due on an investment made by her brother, and involves navy captain Dandy Kidd, who names Cort as executor in his will. C12/565/35 1775 Parry v Cort E140/65/12 Parry v Cort E140/1/23 Cort & Guyon v Parry The two Exchequer (E140) files should help anyone interested in Cort's relationship with David Parry. C12/1034/17 1771 Clarke v Cort C12/2404/40 1778 Waller v Cort C12/1685/2 1784 Cort v Seibert Cort's agency involved him in related activities that could lead to disputes such as these. Other suits C12/940/8 1774 Delmé v Missing Sheds light on some of Cort's contemporaries in Titchfield C12/591/19 1784 Bacon v Homfray By far the juiciest of relevant files, though remote from the Cort story. Set in Cyfarthfa before Crawshay took over. C12/1721/41 1792 Chitty v Parker A pointer to the source of some of Adam Jellicoe's wealth. His wife was a Chitty.
|
|||||||
The pages on this site are copied from the original site of Eric Alexander (henrycort.net) with his allowance. |